ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP

AI Production Methodology

My standardized framework for moving AI from research to production reliably. Focused on Risk, Quality, and Process.

This page documents the methodology I use to take AI systems from research to production in a repeatable way. I use this framework when leading AI initiatives in different domains, adapting it for teams building production AI systems.

Technical Focus

Core Competencies

AI/ML Systems

  • RAG Pipeline Architecture
  • Multi-Model Orchestration
  • Vector Database Design
  • LLM Cost Optimization

Enterprise Architecture

  • Microservices Design
  • API Gateway Patterns
  • Event-Driven Systems
  • Cloud-Native Design

DevSecOps

  • CI/CD Pipeline Design
  • Infrastructure as Code
  • Security Automation
  • Zero-Trust Architecture

Technical Leadership

  • Architecture Decision Records
  • Technical Documentation
  • Code Review Standards
  • Team Mentorship

Design Principles

πŸ”’

Privacy-First

Zero data retention. Ephemeral processing.

πŸ’°

Cost-Conscious

Smart routing and tiered models.

πŸ“‘

Observable

X-Ray tracing, metrics built-in.

πŸ—οΈ

Production-Grade

Security gates and compliance ready.

Lifecycle

My AI Delivery Lifecycle

I use a 5-phase lifecycle to ship production AI systems with predictable quality and minimal risk.

🧭
Phase 1
Discovery
Problem Definition & Data Audit
πŸ§ͺ
Phase 2
Prototyping
Notebook-driven PoC (Evaluation First)
πŸ—οΈ
Phase 3
Engineering
Modularization & API Contract Definition
πŸš€
Phase 4
Deployment
Blue/Green Release via CI/CD
πŸ“ˆ
Phase 5
Observability
Drift Detection & Feedback Loops
Risk & Quality

Quality Gates: Definition of Done

Every PR must pass these automated checks before merge; these gates are non‑negotiable in teams I lead.

⚠️ Non-Negotiable Standard

I do not approve deployments that bypass these gates. In my experience, skipping quality checks for speed always results in slower delivery due to rework and production incidents.

Security Architecture

Production AI Security: The 3-Layer Guardrail

I apply a three-layer guardrail architecture in production: input gatekeeper, model strategy, and output auditor.

πŸ›‘οΈ

Layer 1: Input Gatekeeper

Pre-Inference Security. Heuristic analysis to detect "Jailbreak" patterns and Zero-shot classification to reject out-of-scope queries.

🧠

Layer 2: Model Strategy

Hybrid Inference Architecture. Vendor-agnostic design with OpenRouter gateway. Fine-tuning for style, RAG for facts.

βš–οΈ

Layer 3: Output Auditor

Post-Inference Validation. Self-consistency checks to prevent hallucination and JSON Schema Validation for structured output.

Three layers of defense ensure production AI systems are secure, accurate, and compliant. No single point of failure.

Data Handling NEW

πŸ” Data Sovereignty & Ephemeral Computing

The SQL Sandbox demonstrates our commitment to zero-trust data handling principles across the platform.

πŸ—‘οΈ

Ephemeral-First Architecture

All uploaded databases exist in-memory or temp storage. Automatic cleanup after 30-minute session TTL. No filesystem persistence beyond session scope.

πŸ”’

Read-Only Enforcement

SQLite connections use URI mode flag: ?mode=ro. Agent system prompt blocks DML operations. Pre-execution SQL validation layer.

πŸ“‚

Universal Ingestion Strategy

Native SQLite: Direct connection. SQL Dumps: Runtime rehydration via executescript(). Spreadsheets: Pandas normalization β†’ SQLite translation.

πŸ€–

Agentic Reasoning Layer

LangChain OpenAI Tools agent (temperature=0). Auto-correction on SQL errors. Schema-aware query generation. Transparent SQL exposure (Glass Box AI).

Try the SQL Sandbox β†’ to experience ephemeral data processing in action.

Unit Economics

Tiered Inference Strategy (Cost Control)

In Enterprise SaaS, unchecked inference costs kill margins. I architect systems with a 'Router Pattern' to optimize unit economics:

⚑
Tier 1 (The Router)
Zero-Cost Logic. RegEx/Keyword matching for greetings, navigation, and simple FAQs.
Cost: negligible (no LLM tokens)
πŸš€
Tier 2 (The Workhorse)
Economy Models. Gemini Flash 2.0 / Llama 3.2 for RAG, Summarization, and Extraction.
Cost: Low
🧠
Tier 3 (The Expert)
Reasoning Models. DeepSeek R1 / GPT-4o for complex diagnostics and root cause analysis.
Cost: High

Impact: In practice, this pattern can reduce blended token cost by up to ~85% compared to a naive 'GPT‑4 for everything' approach.

Continuous Improvement

The Data Flywheel

I design feedback loops so models and RAG pipelines improve continuously instead of stagnating after deployment.

πŸ“₯
Input
User Feedback & Correction Data
β†’
βš™οΈ
Process
Automated RAGAS Evaluation + Human Review
β†’
πŸ“€
Output
Fine-tuned LoRA adapters & Improved Retrieval Rankings
β†’
πŸ”„
Loop
Continuous refinement cycle

I use this golden dataset as input for future fine-tuning, prompt/RAG tuning, and regression evaluations.

Team Leadership

How I Run Engineering Teams

My leadership focus is building high-performing, psychologically safe teams through structured rituals and continuous learning.

I lead by example in using AI as a copilot, not a replacement. The goal is to automate boring, repetitive work so people can focus on creative problem solving, decision-making, and deep collaboration. I deliberately design workflows where AI handles low-value tasks (summaries, boilerplate, data prep) and humans own judgment, strategy, and relationships.

🧩 Human-Centered AI Adoption

  • Use AI tools in my own daily work first, then share concrete patterns with the team ('lead by example').
  • Co-design automations with engineers and domain experts so AI upgrades their work conditions instead of threatening their roles.
  • Continuously look for manual, low-value steps to automate, freeing time for design, experimentation, and learning.

πŸ“‹ RFC-Driven Architecture

All significant architectural changes start with a Request for Comments (RFC). This ensures decisions are made collaboratively and prevents technical debt.

πŸ” Blameless Post-Mortems

When incidents occur, I focus on system improvements, not blame. Post-mortems produce concrete action items and runbooks. This builds psychological safety and resilience.

🎯 T-Shaped Skills

I encourage engineers to have deep expertise in one area while maintaining broad knowledge. This is achieved through pair programming and cross-team collaboration, reducing bus factor.

πŸ’‘ How I Use RFCs in Practice

I require a "Problem Statement" and "Alternatives Considered" section in every RFC. This forces us to validate the problem before jumping to solutions and explicitly evaluate trade-offs.

πŸ€–

MegaDoc Assistant

Online β€’ Powered by AI
πŸ€–
Hey there! πŸ‘‹ I'm your MegaDoc assistant. I can help with:
What is MegaDoc? Platform stats API usage